Religious Identity Polarization from a Qur’anic Perspective: An Exegetical Analysis of Qur’an 49:10–13 On the Ethics of Difference

Abdurrahman Sulaimana Saputra; Muhammad Ridho; Habibullah Habibullah; Ali Akbar

doi:10.68051/anjusi.v1i2.69

Authors

Abdurrahman Sulaimana Saputra Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
Muhammad Ridho Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
Habibullah Habibullah Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
Ali Akbar Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.68051/anjusi.v1i2.69

Keywords:

religious identity polarization, Qur’anic ethics of difference, exegesis of Sūrat al-Ḥujurāt, social reconciliation, taʿāruf

Abstract

Religious identity polarization is a social phenomenon that emerges when differences in religious beliefs and group affiliations develop into prejudice, stigmatization, and antagonism that undermine intergroup relations. This study aims to examine the construction of the ethics of difference in Qur’an 49:10–13 and reconstruct its relevance as a normative framework for critically assessing religious identity polarization. Employing a qualitative library-based approach, the study adopts a textual-hermeneutical research design using the comparative method of Qur’anic exegesis (tafsīr muqāran). The analysis integrates linguistic examination, intratextual reading, comparative analysis of classical and modern Qur’anic interpretations, and conceptual engagement with scholarship on social identity and polarization. The findings indicate that these verses establish four interconnected ethical principles: justice-oriented reconciliation (iṣlāḥ), the protection of social dignity, epistemic responsibility in restraining prejudice, and the recognition of human diversity through mutual understanding (taʿāruf). These findings demonstrate that religious solidarity is not inherently incompatible with respect for difference but requires ethical constraints to prevent its transformation into group superiority and social exclusion. The theoretical contribution of this study lies in developing a framework of Qur’anic ethics of difference that distinguishes religious identity and legitimate theological critique from antagonistic practices that undermine the dignity of others. This framework extends Qur’anic exegetical inquiry beyond the identification of individual moral values toward a reconstruction of normative relationships among verses relevant to plural societies. It also provides a conceptual foundation for further scholarship on social reconciliation, religious communication, and education for diversity

References

al-Rāzī, Fakhr al-Dīn. Mafātīḥ Al-Ghayb. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1981.

Al-Ṭabarī, A J M ibn Jarīr. Jāmiʿ Al-Bayān Fī Taʾwīl Al-Qurʾān. Edited by A M N V - 24 Shākir. Muʾassasat al-Risālah, 2000.

Aspinall, Edward, and Marcus Mietzner. “Southeast Asia’s Troubling Elections: Nondemocratic Pluralism in Indonesia.” Journal of Democracy 30, no. 4 (2019): 104–18. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2019.0055.

Banas, J A, E Bessarabova, and Z B Massey. “Meta-Analysis on Mediated Contact and Prejudice.” Human Communication Research 46, no. 2–3 (2020): 120–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqaa004.

Braun, V, and V Clarke. Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. London: Sage, 2022.

Budak, Ceren, Brendan Nyhan, David M Rothschild, Emily Thorson, and Duncan J Watts. “Misunderstanding the Harms of Online Misinformation.” Nature 630 (2024): 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07417-w.

Center, Pew Research. “5 Facts about Muslims and Christians in Indonesia.” Pew Research Center, 2024. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/03/28/5-facts-about-muslims-and-christians-in-indonesia/.

———. “Buddhism, Islam and Religious Pluralism in South and Southeast Asia.” Pew Research Center, 2023. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2023/09/12/buddhism-islam-and-religious-pluralism-in-south-and-southeast-asia/.

Creswell, John W, and Cheryl N Poth. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. Sage Publications, 2018.

Grant-Smith, D, and T Weiler. “Recognising the Value of Non-Professional Part-Time Work in Assessing Graduate Employability: A Challenge to Employers.” Industry and Higher Education 38, no. 4 (2024): 325–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/09504222231208435.

Hakim, L N, and I Bayyinah. “Etika Sosial Perspektif Mufassir Nusantara: Kajian QS. Al-Hujurat Ayat 9–13 Dalam Tafsir Al-Ibriz.” Al-Shamela: Journal of Quranic and Hadith Studies 1, no. 1 (2023). https://doi.org/10.61994/alshamela.v1i1.33.

Hasanah, Z, M Azmi, and S Maryam. “Reconstructing Qur’anic Social Ethics: A Double-Movement Hermeneutical Reading of Q.S. Al-Ḥujurāt: 10–13.” AHKAM: Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Humaniora 5, no. 4 (2026): 4116–30. https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v5i4.11731.

Holili. “Hermeneutika Al-Qur’an Dan Pluralisme Agama: Kajian Atas Ayat-Ayat Toleransi Dalam Perspektif Mufasir Indonesia.” Indonesian Journal of Qur’an and Tafsir Studies 1, no. 2 (2023). https://journal.dinamedia.org/index.php/ijqts/article/view/79.

Ibn Ashur, Muhammad al-Tahir. Al-Tahrir Wa Al-Tanwir. Al-Dar al-Tunisiyyah li al-Nashr, 1984.

Ibn ʿĀshūr, M al-Ṭāhir. Al-Taḥrīr Wa-Al-Tanwīr: Taḥrīr Al-Maʿnā Al-Sadīd Wa-Tanwīr Al-ʿaql Al-Jadīd Min Tafsīr Al-Kitāb Al-Majīd NV - 30. Al-Dār al-Tūnisiyyah li-al-Nashr, 1984.

Ibn ʿĀshūr, Muḥammad al-Ṭāhir. Al-Taḥrīr Wa-Al-Tanwīr. Al-Dār al-Tūnisiyyah li-al-Nashr, 1984.

Iyengar, Shanto, Yphtach Lelkes, Matthew Levendusky, Neil Malhotra, and Sean J Westwood. “The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States.” Annual Review of Political Science 22 (2019): 129–46. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034.

Khairunisa, N, and Kusnadi. “Nilai-Nilai Moderasi Beragama Dan Multikultural Q.S. Al-Hujurat: 13 Dalam Tafsir Al-Misbah.” ATLAS: Journal of Research and Islamic Thought Studies, 2025. https://jurnal.radenfatah.ac.id/index.php/atlas/article/view/29223.

Mietzner, Marcus, and Burhanuddin Muhtadi. “The Mobilisation of Intolerance and Its Trajectories: Indonesian Muslims’ Views of Religious Minorities and Ethnic Chinese.” In Contentious Belonging: The Place of Minorities in Indonesia, edited by Greg Fealy and Ronit Ricci. ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute, 2019. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/contentious-belonging/mobilisation-of-intolerance-and-its-trajectories-indonesian-muslims-views-of-religious-minorities-and-ethnic-chinese/309F0A2C5E1B56B7EF9DD92A022F05D7.

Munauwarah, H H. “Contextual Exegesis of Qur’anic Verses of Unity through Fazlur Rahman’s Double Movement: Responding to Muslim Polarization in the Age of Social Media.” Ulumul Qur’an: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir 6, no. 2 (2026): 278–300. https://doi.org/10.58404/juq.v6i2.885.

Nyhan, Brendan, Jaime Settle, and Emily Thorson. “Like-Minded Sources on Facebook Are Prevalent but Not Polarizing.” Nature 620 (2023): 137–44. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06297-w.

Pahlevi, R, and H B Nasution. “Religious Pluralism in Tafsir Muqaran: A Comparative Study of Al-Tabari Jami Al-Bayan and Quraish Shihab Tafsir Al-Misbah.” International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research of Higher Education 9, no. 3 (2026): 920–32. https://doi.org/10.24036/ijmurhica.v9i3.595.

Putra, Andri Azis. “How To Create Social Cohesion During Pandemic? A Sociological Analysis of Digital Voluntarism As the Path of the Reconstruction of Religious Consciousness in Indonesia.” Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif 16, no. 2 (2022): 317–38. https://doi.org/10.14421/jsr.v16i2.2360.

Riski Suriani Lubis, Jesimawati, Ummatul hasanah. “Reframing Qur’anic Hermeneutics Beyond the Text–Context Binary: A Dialogical Model for Contemporary Interpretation.” Dialogues in Qur’anic and Hadith Studies 01, no. 1 (2026): 27–49.

Saldaña, Johnny. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Sage, 2021.

Setiawan, T, E B P De Jong, P L H Scheepers, and C J A Sterkens. “The Relation between Religiosity Dimensions and Support for Interreligious Conflict in Indonesia.” Archive for the Psychology of Religion 42, no. 2 (2020): 244–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0084672419878824.

Siregar, R R, and M Jamil. “Konsep Multikulturalisme Dalam Surah Al-Hujurat Ayat 13 Perspektif Tafsir Ibnu Katsir.” Jurnal Semiotika-Q: Kajian Ilmu Al-Quran Dan Tafsir 4, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.19109/jsq.v4i1.25099.

Soderborg, S, and Burhanuddin Muhtadi. “Resentment and Polarization in Indonesia.” Journal of East Asian Studies 23, no. 3 (2023): 439–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/jea.2023.17.

Syelviana, A, and Rezwandi. “The Values of Diversity in QS. Al-Hujurat [49]: 13: A Hermeneutical Study of Fazlur Rahman’s Double Movement.” Al-Misykah: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir 6, no. 2 (2025). https://doi.org/10.19109/almisykah.v6i2.31466.