Tafāḍul Without Tafrīq: Reconstructing the Concept of Distinction Among the Messengers in Qur’an 2:253 and 2:285

Ainil Hasanah Harahap; Muna Adila Putri; Ririn Wilka; Ali Akbar

doi:10.68051/anjusi.v1i2.68

Authors

Ainil Hasanah Harahap Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan syarif Kasim Riau
Muna Adila Putri Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
Ririn Wilka Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
Ali Akbar Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Sayrif Kasim Riau

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.68051/anjusi.v1i2.68

Keywords:

tafāḍul without tafrīq, prophetic hierarchy, comparative Qur’anic exegesis, Qur’anic semantics, prophetic legitimacy

Abstract

The relationship between the distinction in rank among the messengers and the obligation to believe in all messengers presents a hermeneutical challenge in interpreting Qur’an 2:253 and 2:285. The former affirms differences in the ranks of the messengers, while the latter prohibits tafrīq (discrimination) among them. This study aims to examine the semantic relationship between these two verses, critically evaluate the arguments advanced by Qur’anic exegetes in reconciling the verses with hadith reports concerning prophetic superiority, and reconstruct the concept of tafāḍul without tafrīq as a theological-hermeneutical framework. Employing a qualitative library-based approach, the study applies the comparative method of Qur’anic exegesis (tafsīr muqāran), integrated with semantic and intratextual analyses. Its primary sources include the Qur’an, relevant hadith reports, and the exegetical works of al-Ṭabarī, al-Rāzī, al-Qurṭubī, Ibn Kathīr, and Ibn ʿĀshūr. The findings demonstrate that tafḍīl refers to distinctions in divine favor and status established by God, whereas tafrīq primarily denotes the selective rejection of the legitimacy of certain messengers. A comparative examination of Qur’anic exegesis and hadith reports indicates that prohibitions against ranking prophets must be understood in light of their textual foundations, contextual circumstances, and the limits of human authority. The study identifies three interconnected conceptual dimensions: differentiation in divine favor, the unity of prophetic legitimacy, and the limits of human comparison. Its theoretical contribution lies in systematically articulating the relationship among these dimensions through the concept of tafāḍul without tafrīq, demonstrating that differences in prophetic rank do not undermine the unity of faith in all messengers. This framework contributes to Qur’anic exegesis and the theology of prophethood by integrating linguistic analysis, intratextual relationships, and classical exegetical reasoning

References

Al-Bukhari, Muhammad ibn Ismail. Al-Jami Al-Musnad Al-Sahih Al-Mukhtasar Min Umur Rasul Allah Wa Sunanih Wa Ayyamih (Sahih Al-Bukhari). Beirut: Dar Tawq al-Najah, 2001.

———. Sahih Al-Bukhari. Edited by Muhammad Zuhayr ibn Nasir Al-Nasir. Beirut: Dar Tawq al-Najah, 2002.

Al-Qurtubi, Muhammad. Al-Jami’ Li Ahkam Al-Qur’an. Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah, 2006.

al-Rāzī, Fakhr al-Dīn. Mafātīḥ Al-Ghayb. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1981.

Al-Ṭabarī, A J M ibn Jarīr. Jāmiʿ Al-Bayān Fī Taʾwīl Al-Qurʾān. Edited by A M N V - 24 Shākir. Muʾassasat al-Risālah, 2000.

Anthony, S W. Muhammad and the Empires of Faith: The Making of the Prophet of Islam. University of California Press, 2020. https://www.ucpress.edu/books/muhammad-and-the-empires-of-faith/hardcover.

Fitriatunnisa, A, and D A Rafdi. “Metode Tafsir Muqaran Dilihat Kembali.” Jurnal Iman Dan Spiritualitas 3, no. 4 (2023). https://doi.org/10.15575/jis.v3i4.31043.

Ibn ʿĀshūr, M al-Ṭāhir. Al-Taḥrīr Wa-Al-Tanwīr: Taḥrīr Al-Maʿnā Al-Sadīd Wa-Tanwīr Al-ʿaql Al-Jadīd Min Tafsīr Al-Kitāb Al-Majīd NV - 30. Al-Dār al-Tūnisiyyah li-al-Nashr, 1984.

Johns, A H. “Prophets and Personalities of the Qur’an.” In The Oxford Handbook of Qur’anic Studies, 488–501, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199698646.013.12.

Kathir, Ibn. Tafsīr Al-Qur’ān Al-‘Aẓīm. Riyadh: Dār Ṭayyibah, 1999.

Neuwirth, Angelika. The Qur’an and Late Antiquity: A Shared Heritage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.

Patel, Y. The Muslim Difference: Defining the Line between Believers and Unbelievers from Early Islam to the Present. Yale University Press, 2022. https://doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300248968.001.0001.

Patel, Youshaa. “‘Whoever Imitates a People Becomes One of Them’: A Hadith and Its Interpreters.” Islamic Law and Society 25, no. 4 (2018): 359–426. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-00254A01.

Reynolds, G S. Allah: God in the Qur’an. Yale University Press, 2020. https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300246582/allah/.

———. Christianity and the Qur’an: The Rise of Islam in Christian Arabia. Yale University Press, 2025. https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300281750/christianity-and-the-quran/.

Reynolds, Gabriel Said. The Qur’an and the Bible: Text and Commentary. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2018.

Saldaña, Johnny. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Sage, 2021.

Sinai, N. The Qur’an: A Historical-Critical Introduction. The Qur’an: A Historical-Critical Introduction: The Qur’an, 2017. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85212730983&partnerID=40&md5=a21fde1ceb5ab73c4440175a64fcddac.

Sinai, Nicolai. Key Terms of the Qur’an: A Critical Dictionary. Princeton University Press, 2023. https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691241319/key-terms-of-the-quran.

Wahid, W M A, and N M R Kamils. “Muqaran Tafsir Method: Its History, Basis and Implications.” Jurnal Iman Dan Spiritualitas 4, no. 3 (2024): 247–54. https://doi.org/10.15575/jis.v4i3.34234.